Abstract
This thesis examines Danish author Theis Ørntoft's literary construction of the Anthropocene in the poetry collection Digte 2014 (2014) and his debut novel Solar (2018). Through a literary analysis informed by Dipesh Chakrabarty's "The Climate of History: Four Theses" (2009) and Amitav Ghosh's The Great Derangement (2016), the thesis argues that Ørntoft does not merely poeticize the theorists' Anthropocene concepts: he takes a step further.
In Digte, this exploration is actualized through a two-tracked synesthetic engine, temporal and spatial, that constructs a literary Anthropocene in which a Chakrabartyan species-perception emerges within a "deep" temporal frame, simultaneously challenging Ghosh's modern narrative grid. In Solar, the central structural figure is the narrator's personality split between voyeur and exhibitionist. This split reflects humanity's broader role in the Anthropocene: voyeurs, spectators of our own destruction, and exhibitionists trapped in cycles of vanity and progression.
Through three game motifs analyzed via Ghosh's grid, the thesis argues that Solar displaces the modern literary grid onto the screen. This marks the thesis's most original contribution: where thinkers like Stephen Kern have previously read the railway and telegraph as configurations of modern temporal and spatial experience, this thesis argues that Ørntoft poeticizes the screen as their Anthropocene equivalent.
In the thesis
Voyeurs, spectators of our own destruction, and exhibitionists trapped in cycles of vanity and progression.
A universe in which the reader may reflect upon their own role in shaping tomorrow's Anthropocene.
Supervisor
The thesis was supervised by Frederik Tygstrup, Professor of Comparative Literature at the University of Copenhagen. Tygstrup is a specialist in the European novel and in literary and cultural theory, and his research ranges across literature and space, geography, aesthetics and intellectual history. His recent books include Finance Aesthetics: A Critical Glossary (Goldsmiths University Press, 2024) and Infrastructure Aesthetics (De Gruyter, 2025).
A paper I am proud of
The Case of RealPage
An essay from my philosophy elective at the University of Copenhagen (Politik, samfund og værdier, autumn 2025). It uses the US antitrust case against the rent-setting software company RealPage to test Yanis Varoufakis's thesis in Technofeudalism: that capitalism is giving way to a system where platform owners collect "cloud rent" instead of competing for profit. The essay asks what the case shows about the opportunities and limits of fighting Big Tech through legislation.
The paper was supervised by Vincent F. Hendricks, Professor of Formal Philosophy at the University of Copenhagen and Director of the Center for Information and Bubble Studies. He is the author of Infostorms, Reality Lost and The Ministry of Truth, and received the Danish Elite Research Prize in 2008.
The scale of the cloudalist takeover is possibly too great to be fought through legislation alone.
Contents
- Introduktion2
- Det antropocæne – fra geologisk, ontologisk til litterært begreb6
- Chakrabarty og de fire teser i "The Climate of History"8
- Amitav Ghoshs litterære bearbejdelse af antropocænen i The Great Derangement12
- Refutatio: Geologisk og humanistisk kritik af antropocænen15
- Digte 201418
- Temporal synæstesi og deep history i "Bølge"20
- Planetær invasion: Digtes brud med Ghoshs gitter24
- Gitterets kollaps i "Sort Frekvens": Breaking news fra Mælkevejen26
- Synæstetisk artsfælle: "Den nye cirkel" erstatter gitteret29
- Solar32
- Del 1 – Voyeurisme, biologi og deep history34
- Del 2 – Ekshibitionisten og antropocæn frihed37
- Del 3 – Koordinaternes kollaps og planetær opløsning39
- Solar i Ghoshs gitter42
- Spil som gitterkritik i Solar43
- Virtualitet som planetær kappe – GTA og The Last of Us46
- Konklusion52
- Litteraturliste56
Master's thesis in Comparative Literature, University of Copenhagen, 2026.
Contact
Book a talk.